GitHub Copilot vs Chatgpt: Which AI Comes Out on Top?

1.5K

In the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence (AI), two powerful tools have emerged as frontrunners in their respective domains: GitHub Copilot vs ChatGPT.

Both developed by OpenAI, these AI-driven platforms offer unique benefits to developers and content creators alike.

In this blog post, we’ll delve into the features, strengths, and weaknesses of both GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT to determine which AI tool reigns supreme.

Quick Comparison: GitHub Copilot vs Chatgpt

Feature	GitHub Copilot	ChatGPT
Primary Use	AI-powered coding assistant	Text responses in the human-like language
Target Audience	Developers, programmers	Writers, content creators, marketers
Price	$19/month per business user	Free to use, $20/month for Plus Subscriber
Chatbot functions	Absent	Good
Input Type	Code	Primarily text-based
Output Type	Code suggestions	Text responses in human-like language
Programming accuracy	Good	Fair
Integration	Visual Studio Code integration	Web-based interface
Image Interpretation	Absent	Good
Developed by	Jointly developed by OpenAI and GitHub	OpenAI

Github copilot vs Chatgpt: Overview

GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT are both powerful AI tools developed by OpenAI, but they serve different purposes and cater to distinct audiences.

GitHub Copilot:

GitHub Copilot is a code-writing AI developed by GitHub in collaboration with OpenAI. It’s an AI-powered code completion tool that works as an extension of the Visual Studio Code editor.

GitHub Copilot draws context from the code you’re working on, suggests whole lines or blocks of code complete your thought, and learns from the billions of lines of public code available on GitHub.

It’s designed to help developers write code faster, learn new languages or frameworks more quickly, and reduce the time spent on hunting for syntax or best practices. It supports multiple languages and frameworks.

ChatGPT:

ChatGPT is a language model developed by OpenAI. It generates sentences that sound like they were written by humans, based on the input it receives.

Originally trained on diverse internet text, it’s capable of drafting emails, writing articles, answering questions, and even engaging in casual conversation or specific tasks like tutoring various subjects.

Even though it can create text, it doesn’t completely grasp the meaning behind what it generates. Its responses come from patterns it has picked up during its training.

This versatile tool can be used for various tasks like customer service, content creation, and AI research. While it mainly works with text inputs, it also does a remarkable job when dealing with image recognition.

Winner: GitHub Copilot comes out on top with its powerful and extensive coding skills, while ChatGPT shines in its wide array of features and abilities as a conversational AI that creates human-like text.

GitHub copilot vs Chatgpt: Chatbot Functions

ChatGPT

ChatGPT is widely used in chatbot applications to automate customer service, answer frequently asked questions, and engage in conversations with users.

It can respond in a friendly manner by using a vast collection of online text created by real people, including news articles, novels, websites, and more.

ChatGPT can interpret images using multimodal language AI models. This allows it to create websites based on sketches and recommend recipes based on a photo of ingredients.

Moreover, ChatGPT can tackle complex tasks such as basic computer programming, drafting simple lawsuits, designing elementary computer games, passing exams, checking for plagiarism, generating written content, summarizing documents, highlighting key passages within the text, and translating into multiple languages.

ChatGPT also excels at analyzing information, evaluating online behaviour, and even suggesting products as part of the sales and upselling process.

Its automation capabilities cover appointment scheduling, reservations, payment processing, shipping schedule inquiries, order updates, product returns, and checking product and service availability, all with impressive accuracy.

GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot, on the other hand, doesn’t do all of this, but it isn’t meant to. Instead of trying to match ChatGPT’s versatility, GitHub Copilot focuses solely and effectively on its purpose as an AI assistant for software coding.

Winner: ChatGPT takes the prize as a chatbot.

ChatGPT vs GitHub Copilot: In-Depth Look at Features, Strengths, and Weaknesses

Features of ChatGPT

• User-Friendly Interface: ChatGPT offers a straightforward and intuitive interface, enabling users to generate content with ease.
  
• Customizable Prompts: Users can input specific prompts to guide the AI in creating desired content.
  
• Versatile Content Generation: ChatGPT can craft content for various purposes, including marketing materials, creative writing, and informational articles.
  

Strengths of ChatGPT

• Helps overcome writer’s block by generating fresh ideas and content.
• Facilitates the creation of engaging and creative content with minimal effort.
• Saves time by providing suggestions for headlines, outlines, and content structure.
• Boosts productivity by automating parts of the content creation process.

Weaknesses of ChatGPT

• Generated content may need editing and refinement to meet quality standards.
• Can occasionally produce repetitive or off-topic content.
• Dependence on AI could result in less original or unique content.

Features of GitHub Copilot

• Seamless Integration with Visual Studio Code: GitHub Copilot effortlessly integrates with Visual Studio Code, providing developers with an accessible and familiar platform to work on.
  
• Context-Aware Code Suggestions: Copilot’s AI model grasps the context of your project and offers relevant, accurate code suggestions tailored to your current work.
  
• Support for Multiple Languages: GitHub Copilot caters to various programming languages such as Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, HTML, CSS, and more.
  

Strengths of GitHub Copilot

• Accelerates coding by offering auto-complete suggestions for functions and methods.
• Assists developers in discovering new APIs or libraries they might not be aware of.
• Minimizes the need to search for code snippets or solutions online.
• Potentially enhances code quality through best practice suggestions.

Weaknesses of GitHub Copilot

• Doesn’t always generate accurate code – developers must still review and modify suggestions.
• May produce code with licensing or copyright concerns.
• This could foster over-reliance on AI, potentially hindering creativity or problem-solving skills.

Winner: For coding assistance, GitHub Copilot is the winner. For content generation and overcoming writer’s block, ChatGPT excels. Each tool thrives in its domain – GitHub Copilot for programming and ChatGPT for content creation.

GitHub copilot vs Chatgpt: Response Accuracy

ChatGPT occasionally makes errors based on outdated data, but it’s generally accurate. It has faced some issues with unusual responses and incorrect answers. However, each new version improves, with GPT-4 showing greater accuracy.

OpenAI claims that GPT-4 is 82% less likely to produce content it shouldn’t and 60% less likely to make up answers. But it’s not perfect, including in coding. Its programming output should always be checked by a human.

GitHub Copilot also has accuracy concerns. Users accept about 26% of all completions it shows, which rises to 40% for Python.

So, GitHub Copilot doesn’t generate flawless code; it creates the best code within its context. As a result, code might not always work. Sometimes, it depends on outdated libraries or languages.

Languages like Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, and Go usually perform better than others. GitHub Copilot’s accuracy improves when code is divided into smaller functions, meaningful names are used for parameters, and clear instructions are given.

Any code suggested by GitHub Copilot must be thoroughly tested and reviewed. Nevertheless, it outperforms ChatGPT in code generation.

Winner: GitHub Copilot takes the lead in software coding.

AI Security Battle: GitHub Copilot vs ChatGPT

ChatGPT hasn’t focused much on security so far. Developers using it need to add their own security features.

On the other hand, GitHub Copilot benefits from the numerous security features that GitHub has added over the years. For business users, Copilot offers coding privacy and other protective measures.

An AI-based system prevents vulnerabilities by blocking risky coding patterns in real time, making suggestions more secure.

Copilot targets common weak coding patterns, like hardcoded credentials, SQL injections, and path injections. This helps identify vulnerabilities even in incomplete code fragments.

Winner: GitHub Copilot comes out ahead in security.

ChatGPT vs. GitHub Copilot: An Integration Comparison

ChatGPT, stemming from the open-source community, can be easily connected to other applications through an API. It offers plugins for services like Kayak, Expedia, Shopify, OpenTable, and Slack, and supports a range of programming languages.

GitHub Copilot works seamlessly with Visual Studio Code, Neovim, Visual Studio, and JetBrains IDEs. It can examine and utilize billions of lines of code across various languages.

However, since it relies on public code, integration with new libraries, frameworks, and APIs may be limited, impacting coding accuracy. GitHub Copilot needs time to accumulate enough examples for precise code suggestions.

Winner: No definitive winner emerges in the area of integration.

Similarities Between Github Copilot and ChatGPT

Both ChatGPT and Github copilot share some similarities, including:

1. AI-Powered: Both tools are powered by advanced AI models, which enable them to generate content and suggestions based on their training data.
   
2. Language Understanding: They both have a strong understanding of natural language, allowing them to process and interpret user inputs effectively.
   
3. Code Assistance: While GitHub Copilot is specifically designed for code completion and assistance, ChatGPT can also provide help with coding tasks to some extent.
   
4. Continuous Improvement: Both platforms are updated and improved over time as their AI models learn from new data and user feedback.
   
5. API Access: Both ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot offer APIs that allow developers to integrate their functionalities into other applications or services.
   
6. Versatility: Both tools can be used across various industries and use cases, thanks to their adaptability and the power of AI technology.

Github Copilot vs Chatgpt: Pricing

ChatGPT offers a free basic version, while the ChatGPT Plus version costs around $20 per month. Subscribers enjoy benefits such as access during busy times, quicker responses, and first dibs on new features and enhancements.

As for GitHub Copilot, you can choose between a monthly or yearly subscription. The monthly plan costs $10 per month, while the yearly option is priced at $100 per year.

Conclusion

In summary, GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT are AI-driven tools with distinct purposes. GitHub Copilot excels in code assistance for developers, while ChatGPT focuses on generating human-like text for content creation. Users should choose the platform that best aligns with their specific needs and objectives to maximize the benefits of these powerful AI tools.

Frequently Asked Questions